Ossett’s place in the history of the North of England.
Roman artefacts, such as Roman coins, were found at Streetside, which was on the Roman Road, the Via Vicinalis on its way from Manchester to Tadcaster and York, via Castleshaw, Huddersfield, Dewsbury and Wakefield. Streetside is thought to have been a hamlet on the Via Vicinalis.
Aside: the author now lives in Saddleworth and, in certain lights at certain times of the year, the outline of this same Roman Road from Manchester to York can be seen in Castleshaw valley in Saddleworth, approaching the remains of the Castleshaw Roman Fort.
The name Ossett is older than Roman, however, and is probably derived from the Saxon language, meaning either “the fold of a man named Osla” or “a fold frequented by blackbirds” or possibly from the Viking language, meaning “ridge camp”. In Saxon times, Ossett was on the edge of the large Saxon settlement of Dewsbury, which then encompassed Huddersfield, Mirfield and Bradford.
After the Norman Invasion, the north took part in a revolt against the Normans, with Viking help, but the revolt was put down and King William took retribution on the North by laying waste the northern shires and killing the inhabitants. This “Harrying of the North” (see Brief notes on the History of Yorkshire) left many villages empty for a generation and large areas of Yorkshire and other northern counties were still laying waste in 1086, ‘wasta est’, as Domesday says.
In theDomesday survey of 1086, Ossett is named “Osleset” and was recorded as having 3.5 carucates of land (420 acres), which is the amount that would need three teams of eight oxen to plough it. This was about 10-20% of the settlement that was set aside as arable land. Woodland pasture measured “half a league long as much broad” (roughly six furlongs by six furlongs). There were other areas of trees with paling to prevent animal entry. Only about 10% of the land was wooded, showing that much of it had been cleared before 1086 and the remainder was being managed. Animals grazed on “woodland pasture” and the trees were pollarded above animal height, allowing the sunlight to slip through and giving rise to the name “the Lights”. Ossett Lights, with 254 acres, was typical of common land at the time. In 1086, Ossett had only seven families, headed by four villeins and three bordars. A villein was a tenant farmer in Feudal terms, who was tied to the Lord of the Manor. He was somewhere between a free man and a slave. The word is from a Roman word meaning “a man employed at a villa”. A bordar was a man ranking below a villein but above a serf. A bordar might hold enough land to feed a family and would be required to also provide labour for his Lord on certain days each week.
Many of the areas around Ossett were still laid waste. Even the Manor of Wakefield only had 9 villagers, 22 smallholders, 11 freemen and three priests. The value of Wakefield to the Lord of the manor in 1066 had been £60, but in 1086 was only £15.
By 1087, Ossett was one of 57 townships in the Manor of Wakefield. The Manorial system, which began in Roman times, was well established but the area but was still depleted of men, having not recovered from the slaughter of 1069-70. The villagers were allowed the rights of pasture for pigs and they could forage for wood, for kindling and to build houses and fences. Mineral rights remained with the Lord of the Manor. The rights and obligations of the villagers lasted for hundreds of years until the “Enclosures Act” of 1807.
Feudal laws remained in force under the Normans and, between the end of the 11th century and the middle of the 14th Century, the population of Yorkshire and of course, Ossett, only slightly increased. In the earlier part of this period, Britain was experiencing a climatic warm period which enabled good harvests and grapes could be grown even as far north as Yorkshire. From the beginning of the 14th Century, the country experienced the beginning of a period called “the Little Ice Age”, when the average temperature dropped by one and a half degrees Celsius and crop failure and starvation and disease became more common.
Ossett’s population rose only slowly at first from only about 30 in 1086; 55 in 1300 then more rapidly to about 1,200 inhabitants in 1700.
The poll tax was a tax per head, rather than on goods. It was levied just three times, in 1377, 1379 and 1381. Each time the basis was slightly different. In 1377, everyone over the age of 14 and not exempt had to pay a groat (2p) to the Crown. By 1379 that had been graded by social class, with the lower limit raised to 16, (and 15 two years later). Exemption of the poor means that about 40% of inhabitants of any village or town were not counted. Because they were poor, they would not be recorded as making wills either. Perhaps Manor Court records might pick up a few errant poor people, but on the whole, unless a family had a certain level of means, they do not appear in records from this period.
I looked for some of my family surnames in the Poll Tax Rolls for Yorkshire. In Ossett, I did not find any Archer or Ellis. But I did find Wilson, Scott and Maunsfield, which are names of some of the Ossett families from whom I am descended, possibly establishing for me a family link with the town as far back as the fourteenth century.
Subsidy Rolls (Poll Tax) for the year 1379 Agbrigg wapentake, Dewsbury parish: VILLATA DE OSSET.
|Thomas Wodhowse iiij.d.|
Willelmus filius Ricardi iiij.d.
Thomas de Westerton, Marchant xij.d.
Robertus Hyruyng’ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Alicia filia ejus iiij.d.
Johannes de ffernley iiij.d.
Matilda de ffernley iiij.d.
Willelmus de Hill’ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Thomas Hogg’ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Willelmus filius Hugoni & uxor ejus, Taillour vj.d.
Adam Schephird’ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Thomas de Hyll’ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Johannes Norwod & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Magota Wilborne iiij.d.
Hugo Ranald’ iiij.d.
Matilda Swansoñ iiij.d.
Adam filius Thome & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Johannes Bull’ & uxor ejus, Soutter iiij.d.
Alicia Margery iiij.d.
Ancilla Willelmi Richard iiij.d.
Johannes Wod’ & uxor ejus, Wrigh’ vj.d.
Johannes Hardgat & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Willelmus filius Johannis & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Katerina ancilla ejus iiij.d.
Ricardus filius Johannis, Smyth’ xv.d.
Alicia ancilla ejus iiij.d.
Johannes Jodsoñ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Isabella filia ejus iiij.d.
Ricardus Willesoñ iiij.d.
Alicia de Merlay iiij.d.
Johannes del Wodde & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Johannes Hardgate & uxor ejus iiij.d
Willelmus Jonesoñ et uxor ejus iiij.d
Katerina ancilla uxor ejus (sic) iiij.d
Johanna filia ejus iiij.d.
|Thomas Dyschforth’ & uxor ejus|
Thomas filius Willelmi & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Willelmus Butt & uxor ejus, Taillour vj.d.
Ricardus Mawnfill’ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Hugu Malsoñ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Henricus Hawkisue iiij.d.
Elizabetha de Balne iiij.d.
Alicia Hardgat iiij.d.
Thomas Hyruyng & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Alicia Swaynsoñ iiij.d.
Ricardus atte ye Thounhende iiij.d.
Johannes de Clatoñ iiij.d.
Willelmus ffoster & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Magota de Hetoñ iiij.d.
Alicia filia ejus iiij.d.
Johannes Wylbor junior iiij.d.
Magota Scott’ iiij.d.
Johannes Mawsell’ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Hugo Scot & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Thomas Grene & uxor ejus, Walker vj.d.
Alicia uxor Hugonis iiij.d.
Ricardus filius Hugonis, Smyth’ vj.d.
Alicia de Morlay iiij.d.
Agnes Cowper iiij.d.
Ricardus Hyrueryng’ (sic) & uxor ejus, Souter xij.d.
Willelmus filius ejus iiij.d.
Ricardus Malynsoñ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Adam filius Johannis iiij.d.
Johannes de Grene & uxor ejus, Wrygh’ vj.d.
Johannes Wilbore & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Willelmus Discheforth & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Johannes filius Thome & uxor ejus, Couper vj .d.
Robertus Somañ & uxor ejus iiij.d.
Matilda de Lokytoñ iiij.d.
Thomas filius ejus iiij.d.
Hugo filius ejus iiij.d.
|Summa- xxvij.s. x.d.||(Sum 27 shillings and 10 pence)|
The Woollen Industry in Ossett – Broadcloth, Shoddy and Mungo
To be continued.